Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts

08 April 2011

Gambia News:Was Taranga FM’s Closure due to Administrative Procedure?Minister Should Not Misinform Assembly

Daily News Gambia -The response of the minister of Information and Communication Infrastructure to the question raised by Jarra Central parliamentarian as to what led to the closure of Taranga FM sounds appears to be misleading.
The Information minister’s response that Taranga FM was closed due to administrative procedure as carried on The Point newspaper prompt us to question whether the minister is not speculating or misinforming the august assembly.
The closure of Taranga FM, a community radio station situated in Sinchu Alhagie, Kombo North on January 13, 2011, was an order from the National Intelligence Agency (NIA).
The station remained off the air for 32 days, which left its keen listeners in the dark. It added to the worries of all those concerned about freedom of expression and freedom of the press in The Gambia.
Later, a letter addressed to the proprietor dated 14 January stated that Taranga FM could relay news, but from the state owned-Gambia Radio and Television Services (GRST), if the station is interested in broadcasting news.
The government’s directive was contained in a letter to the manager of the station and signed on behalf of H. M Tambedou, Secretary General of the office of President.
The letter advised Taranga FM management to desist from reviewing opposition-linked and Western sponsored newspapers. With those conditions, the station is allowed to come back on the air without its popular “Xibari besbi”, (meaning news of the day in Wollof), which entailed news and current affairs programme that reviewed newspapers in Mandinka and Wollof the two major languages in The Gambia.
This means Taranga FM is only given the green light to review news from the government-controlled Gambia Radio and Television Service (GRTS). That is why the audiences are listening to a different Taranga FM – without ‘Xabari besbi’. This is how matters stand.
We could not understand what administrative procedure is the information minister talking about. Perhaps, he did not know the content of this letter, which we assume he should. And if he doesn’t, then we would ask: Is the minister’s hands not tied on his back in executing his job properly?
The purpose of calling ministers to the National Assembly is to clarify issues within their responsibility. The deputies have a role to scrutinize institutions, policies, and public officers etc.
So, whatever a minister says in the National Assembly should be clear, factual and in the legitimate interest of the country, without fear favour, affection or ill will.
The government of The Gambia should stop doing actions it cannot defend.

Source:dailynews.gm  

31 March 2011

Gambia ALERT: Sports journalist in court for hosting aggrieved golf workers


MFWA-The Kanifing District Magistrate Court will on March 31, 2011 continue with the criminal trial of Bakary B. Baldeh, a sports producer and presenter of West Coast Radio, a privately-owned FM station, over a February 11 sports programme that the Gambian authorities claimed was criminal and meant to incite violence among Gambians.


This will the third time that Baldeh will appear before the court to answer charges of “conspiracy to commit felony”, and a “conspiracy” to incite violence. The charges stemmed from the presenter’s hosting of two aggrieved golf workers who had accused Ebrima Jawara, President of the Gambia Golfers Association and the son of former President Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara, of unfair treatment during a recent national golf tournament in the country. The tournament was sponsored by PresidentYahya Jammeh. Baldeh has since pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
On its website on March 25, the pro-government Banjul-based The Daily Observer newspaper reported that Baldeh is being tried as a result of an alleged complaint filed by Ebrima Jawara. However, Media Foundation forWest Africa (MFWA) sources in the Gambia said that that was not the case and that Jawara has denied that he initiated the action.
Baldeh was arrested on March 23 after being invited to the Karaiba police station in the Kanifing Municipality in the northern part of Banjul together with the station’s proprietor, Peter Gomez. While Gomez was released after a brief interrogation, Baldeh was illegally detained for three days. He was released on March 25 after making his first appearance in court. 
Meanwhile, Baldeh has decided to temporary suspend his programme until his ordeal is over, according to the Daily Observer

Source:MFWA

28 March 2011

Gambia News :Independent Journalists Denied Entry at National Assembly

Journalists from independent press have been denied entry by state security agents to cover the State Opening of the National Assembly on Friday by President Yahya Jammeh despite having official accreditation.  
Reporters from Foroyaa, Today, The Point, Marketplace (Magazine), News and Report (Magazine), The Voice, and The Daily News private newspapers, frustratingly stood at the door to the National Assembly for about an hour before they were allowed-in by frown-faced security agents after the newly appointed press director at State House, Fatou Camara pleaded with them.
In very strong terms, Gambian president Yahya Jammeh recently dispelled reports that his government is restricting independent press to access official information. However, Friday’s incident could be said to lay bare Jammeh administration’s unwillingness to open doors to the private press.  
Mr Lamin Jahateh of Marketplace briefly explains here how it all happened:
“Go away; we don’t need the private press here. Go!” a female security agent barked at us. She shut her eyes at us as we pulled-out and put on view the accreditations given to us by the National Assembly to cover the ceremony.
To our surprise, a reporter from Daily Observer, a pro-government newspaper, came and met us standing. As soon as he told the security agents: “I am from Daily Observer,” they ushered him in a full escort. He entered through the door used by dignitaries.
After standing under the sun in frustration for almost thirty minutes, we then approached Fatou Camara, the newly appointed Director of Press and Public Relations at Office of the President and explained the situation to her.  “Ok, let me come,” Fatou told us.
We beamed in anticipation that very soon we will enter. But Fatou never returned up until a Foroyaa newspaper, Abubacarr Saidykhan, went to find out whether the DPPR will come or she has forgotten us. 
About ten to fifteen minutes later, Saidykhan then appeared with a glimmer of hope: “Follow me,” he told us in a strong voice, accompanied by gesticulation. As we followed Abubacarr, we met Fatou Camara pleading with the NIA officers at the door for them to allow us in.  One of them then nodded his head in acceptance that we can enter. “But you said seven, so only seven of them will enter,” one of them firmly told Fatou Camara. This is how we entered, thanks to Fatou Camara.  We spent almost an hour standing outside before we were allowed to enter. The president was more than mid-way into his speech by the time we entered.”

Source:dailynews.gm

23 March 2011

Gambia News:Where is Youssef Ezzidine? No Answer Yet!

There is no answer yet to the whereabouts of Youssef Ezzidine, who was convicted of treason and sentenced to death together with seven others on 15 July, 2010. All eight of them appealed their conviction and sentence, but Ezzidine has failed to appear at the hearing of the appeal for the fifth consecutive time. 
During President Jammeh’s meeting with media heads on Wednesday 16 March 2011, he asserted that public servants are free to give information to satisfy the public interest. In the Editorial of Foroyaa 18-20 March 2011 it was indicated that the Managing Editor of Foroyaa will visit the Ministry of the Interior on Monday to find out why Youssef Ezzidine is not appearing in court like the others who are in the same appeal case.
The Managing Editor did visit the Ministry on Monday but was told upon enquiry at the reception that the permanent secretary had travelled. He then asked for the Minister of the Interior but he was told that he was at a workshop. Thereafter he asked for the Deputy Permanent Secretary but was told that the DPS was at a workshop. He wanted to leave a message with the secretary but was told by the lady at the reception that she too had gone to the workshop. Finally, he wanted to leave a message with the lady at the reception but she advised him to return on the following day.
On the following day, the Managing Editor called the Deputy Permanent Secretary and explained to her that he had been there the day before and since the Permanent Secretary had travelled he would like to find out from her about the non-appearance of Youssef Ezzidine in court. The DPS asked the Managing Editor to go over to the Ministry and when the Managing Editor asked when he can do the DPS told him he could come next Friday, when the Permanent Secretary would have returned.
This is how matters stand regarding the Ezzidine issue. We will keep our readers informed about developments. 



Source:foroyaa.gm

Gambia News: Jammeh to news media: I set limits on press freedom



Last week, Gambian President Yahya Jammeh participated in a rare meeting with select members of the West African nation's press corps. Jammeh spoke in favor of access to public information. He announced that he would allow The Standard newspaper to resume publication, five months after the National Intelligence Agency forced its editor, Sheriff Bojang, to halt production. But the president largely lashed out at the Gambian private press and critics of his repressive media policies in the meeting, a tense session that was broadcast on state television. Jammeh, a former army captain who seized power in a 1994 coup, spoke in a harsh and contemptuous tone as he addressed media owners invited to the State House in the capital, Banjul.
"If anybody thinks that this is a mere public relations stunt, you're mistaken," Jammeh told journalists and a few officials present. "What you perceive as a reality is not reality," he said, chastising journalists for portraying the image that "Yahya Jammeh is a monster, he's a dictator, he's a killer, that Gambia is not a place for journalists.'" He insisted that he was not hostile to the press. "You think I'm stupid? I don't like the press, I don't like the freedom of press and I allow newspapers? I want to tell you that we're not your enemies," he said. "You have to a positive role to play in national development, peace, and stability."
The president was quick to narrow the scope of press freedom. "If you're interested in development, you want peace and stability, then you don't have anything to fear from me." But press freedom has limits, Jammeh said, and it is he who sets those limits. "One freedom I will never give you is the freedom, the liberty to write whatever you want that you know is not true. There is press freedom, but there's no freedom to lie."  
He added: "If I have to close any newspaper because you have violated the laws, I will close it. ... I will not billahi wallahi, sacrifice the interests, the peace and stability and well-being of the Gambian people at the altar of freedom of expression, or freedom of press, or freedom of movement or freedom of whatever."
At times, Jammeh appeared to contradict himself. "Sensationalism in journalism will not be accepted. Tell me one country where there's no law on libel," he said before declaring, "There's no section that criminalizes speech. I don't know where you got that from but as far as I am concerned, there's no law that says that you can be taken to court and charged with a criminal offense for speech." At least two of the journalists present--Pap Seine and Sam Sarr--could attest to the presence and use of such laws: They were jailed on criminal sedition charges in connection with a 2009 press release critical of Jammeh's comments on the unsolved murder of editor Deyda Hydara.
Again last week, Jammeh disputed any government responsibility in the Hydara case, as well as in the case of Ebrima "Chief" Manneh, a reporter who disappeared after being arrested in 2007. "I will not kill anyone outside of the law," he said. "You see, if I have to cut the heads of 10,000 people to save 1 million, I will do so with happiness, but on the condition that they have been sentenced by a court of law." He went on to repeat: "We will not kill anyone clandestinely." 
Yet Jammeh referenced Manneh's case as a "death," and suggested the journalist might have disappeared after attempting to illegally migrate to Europe or America. The statement implied knowledge of Manneh's fate that has not been disclosed publicly and that runs contrary to his administration's repeated public statements. In a letter to Jammeh on Monday, CPJ called on the president to clarify his reference to Manneh's "death" and fully disclose the government's knowledge of the case.
"In all previous public comments, administration officials have consistently denied any knowledge of Manneh's detention, whereabouts, or legal status," CPJ's letter said. "Those comments were made despite sightings of Manneh in government custody after his 2007 arrest. Government denials were also issued in response to a June 2008 ruling by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, which found sufficient evidence to conclude Gambian authorities had improperly detained Manneh."
Jammeh had some words of warning for the assembled journalists, accusing some of being "mouthpiece of opposition parties." His words apparently chilled initial press coverage of the meeting; all the leading newspapers omitted the president's comments on the Hydara and Manneh cases.

22 March 2011

GAMBIA NEWS: PDOIS´ STATEMENT THE MEETING BETWEEN THE PRESS AND THE EXECUTIVE

Issued by Halifa Sallah
We have watched and listened very carefully to the statements made by heads of media houses in the Gambia and that delivered by President Jammeh. PDOIS deems it necessary to state our policy on the Media just to convince the Gambian people how a government that is genuinely committed to the protection to freedom of expression and freedom of the Media would have handled the first major encounter between the Gambian Media and the Executive.
We have reflected on every word uttered by heads of media houses and those uttered by the members of the executive. We have weighed their words against the scales of reason and decency. We want the Gambian people in particular and those who have heard the programme to reflect on the words of the two sides and judge for themselves which side has displayed greater maturity and decency.

We in PDOIS would like to affirm that contrary to what President Jammeh had said that it is not his aim to appease the media fraternity, democratic governance is inconceivable without appeasing the sovereign people.
The Constitution is very clear on this and we will never get tired of repeating its very words that “The Sovereignty of the Gambia resides in the people of the Gambia from whom all organs of Government derive their authority and in whose name and for whose welfare and prosperity the powers of government are to be exercised….”
Democracy is government by consent. Consent comes through appeasement. A government has a role to lead by consent or rule by coercion. There is no middle road. Those who lead by consent are called democrats and those who rule by coercion are called tyrants. Each government has to choose one system or the other.
PDOIS is committed to lead by consent. It is left to the APRC to decide how it intends to govern.
This is why we value the opinions expressed by heads of the Media houses. If we were in the shoes of the President we would have asked the Attorney General to take note when the heads spoke about the need to repeal unfriendly media laws and the recommendation to enact a Freedom of Information Act. We would have asked the Minister of Finance to take note of the complaints lodged against levies and taxes that make it difficult for the Media houses to operate. The Minister of information would have been asked to take note of the restrictions placed on the State media and Non Governmental Radio stations in broadcasting divergent views and dissenting opinions. The Minister of the Interior would have been asked to take note of the concerns raised regarding diligent investigation into the cases of Journalists like Deyda Hydara and Chief Manneh. The Head of the Civil Service would have been asked to take note of the concerns about access to information from public servants.
We would have raised the issue of a self regulatory mechanism to ensure that the media publishes or broadcasts the truth in good faith in the public interest, retract wrong reports and render apologies. We would have signed a memorandum of understanding with the Media operatives and consult them in the appointment of any Minister of Information.
Did the President and his Vice President and Ministers take this approach? The answer is in the negative.
They made allegations that journalists are untrained when most reporters have undergone and are undergoing training to develop their professionalism. They claim that journalists do not publish the good things the government does even though the pages of newspapers are filled with reports of workshops, seminars, projects launched or press releases issued by government institutions. They gave the impression that in the West one could only be a journalist if one has a diploma or degree in journalism when some renowned journalists and broadcasters had never been in the four cornered walls of a school of journalism and had developed their professionalism through apprenticeship. They gave the impression that in the West newspapers do not give support to political parties when one could even classify newspapers ideologically in those countries.
In our view, in any democratic society, there is the state media which is maintained by the tax payers and the non-state media which is maintained through its readers and clients for advertisement. In such a country a party must be divorced from the state and the state media must publish or broadcast divergent views and dissenting opinion.
It goes without saying that since the media is a mere instrument for the amplification of the voices of the people, one could have media belonging to religious, political, cultural and social groups.
What is very clear is that the non state Media establishments which operate commercially in democratic societies could be classified into three types. Some do give editorial leanings to conservative parties and others to progressive parties. Others take the middle road and take no sides. However, regardless of the leaning of a media establishment it is ethically bound to publish the truth in good faith in the public interest. Truth, Good faith and the Public interest constitute the motto of the free press in a democratic society.
The Media Commission Act which was repealed was the most draconian media legislation that could be conceived by the human mind. Let us just highlight one provision to help refresh the mind of the nation to the content which made the whole world to condemn it. Section 13 required media practitioners to register with the Commission but excluded media practitioners employed by the state. Paragraph (5) of this section states that “the commission shall issue a licence to a media practitioner or media organisation registered under this section.”
It added that “the registration of a media practitioner or media organisation shall be valid for one year and may be renewed from year to year.”
In short, all media houses and practitioners would have had to renew their licence to operate annually. One could understand why the Media commission was rejected by media houses because of its contravention of section 25 of the constitution which provides the right to freedom of expression and freedom of the Media.
PDOIS will encourage the Media practitioners to come up with a self regulatory body which would rely on persuasive influence and peer pressure to ensure adherence to the principle of publishing the truth in good faith in the public interest by all.
PDOIS understands the importance of freedom of expression and freedom of the media. Without freedom of expression there can be no information and without information there can be no knowledge and without knowledge there can be no awareness and without awareness human beings will grope in the dark from the cradle to the grave. Such human beings could never enjoy liberty, dignity or prosperity.
We hope the executive will understand why all just human beings have kept the memory of Deyda Hydara alive. This is the only way to deter others from committing such heinous crime. Look at Mexico today and reflect on what organised crime has given birth to. When Deyda was murdered and Ousman Sillah shot it became clear that Gambia was graduating from being a small society where people, irrespective of their differences attend each other’s ceremonies and put aside their antagonisms to express condolences during funerals, and was beginning to nurture people with hearts of stones who could hide in the dark to kill and maim their fellow citizens with impunity. It was necessary for the conscience of the nation to be awakened by keeping alive the question: Who Killed Deyda Hydara?
We in PDOIS called on the executive to understand the motive and keep alive the call to rid the country of organised crime so that all will live in unity, freedom and peace each day. What all just Gambians have called for is diligent investigation into the killing of Deyda and the disappearance of Chief Manneh. This is not too much to ask for. All have heeded the call of the executive for information. All should forward the information available to them.
This is the aspiration of PDOIS. This is what we promise to work for if we ever take over the helm or take part in a coalition government that aims to truly lead by consent, reason and justice instead of ruling by coercion and might.
Be ready to judge us by our words and actions and not by our intentions.

21 March 2011

In Gambia, Jammeh asked to clarify Manneh's 'death'


After much denial about the whereabouts of Chief Ebrima Manneh, President Yahya Jammeh now says he is dead. The CPJ wrote to him to clarify.Below we produce the letter from the CPJ.

March 21, 2011
H.E. Yahya A.J.J. Jammeh
President of the Republic of The Gambia
State House
Banjul, The Gambia
Via facsimile +220 4227 034
Dear President Jammeh:
We request clarification of your March 16 comments suggesting "Chief" Ebrima Manneh, a reporter for the Daily Observer, may have died. Manneh disappeared after witnesses saw him being arrested by state security agents in the offices of the Daily Observer on July 7, 2007. The government has previously denied any knowledge of Manneh's fate.
"Let me make it very clear that the government has nothing to do with the death of Chief Manneh or Deyda Hydara or the disappearances of so many people," you said in a meeting with representatives of Gambian media that was broadcast on state television. You also suggested Manneh might have disappeared after attempting to illegally migrate to Europe or the United States.
Your statement implies knowledge of Manneh's fate that has not been conveyed to the journalist's family or disclosed publicly. In all previous public comments, administration officials have consistently denied any knowledge of Manneh's detention, whereabouts, or legal status. Those comments were made despite sightings of Manneh in government custody after his 2007 arrest. Government denials were also issued in response to a June 2008 ruling by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, which found sufficient evidence to conclude Gambian authorities had improperly detained Manneh.
In the interest of transparency and to relieve the anguish of Manneh's family, which deserves to know his fate, we call on you to fully disclose your knowledge of Manneh's fate and to order all appropriate investigations into his case.
We look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Joel Simon
Executive Director

Souce:cpj.org

19 March 2011

No Public Relation Exercise And No Appeasement as PRESIDENT JAMMEH MEETS MEDIA HEADS

On Wednesday, 16 March 2011 The President and some members of the Cabinet were engaged in a frank and open exchange of views with the media fraternity at state house which lasted for three and half hours.
Those who spoke on behalf of the Executive were President Jammeh, Vice President Madam Isatou Njie Saidy, the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Mr. Cham, the Minister of Health Madam Fatim Badjie, the Minister of Finance Mr. Mamburay Njie and the Secretary General and Head of the Civil service, Dr Njogu Bah. The Heads of Media Houses who spoke were Mr. Swaebou Conateh of News and Report, Mr. Pap Saine of The Point, Mr. Sam Sarr of Foroyaa and Mr. Hamid Adiamoh of Today.
The meeting emanated from the initiatives taken by the new Director of Press and Public Relations, Mrs. Fatou Camara to facilitate dialogue between the Executive and the Media. She first invited heads of media houses to a meeting at state house to explore ways and means through which the executive could enter into dialogue with the media in order to address their respective concerns. The media houses that went to state house for the meeting were The Point, Foroyaa, Daily News and Today. Mrs. Camara took the concerns of the media personnel and promised to report to the Secretary General and the President. In less than a week after the meeting she again called to schedule a meeting with the president which took place at state house on Wednesday 16 March 2011.
In this edition, we will publish a summary of the issues raised but a full report will be published in the next edition.

THE PRESIDENT
The President opened the meeting with general comments on his commitment to his oath of office and his desire not to trample on the freedom of expression of Gambians. After the Media heads spoke he implied that some members of the press may have interpreted his attempt to reach out to the Press as a public relation exercise or an attempt to appease the press because of the current happenings in the World.
He therefore changed his tone by emphasizing that he is not engaged in a public relation exercise and is not trying to appease the Media and does not expect the Media to praise him. He observed that some Media heads appear to be at war and do not want to recognise his status and indicated that he would have media briefings with those who would observe the normal protocols observed elsewhere.
He emphasised that he is working for the interest of all Gambians and for the peace and stability of the country. Apart from Allah he is answerable to the Gambian people and he will not sacrifice the peace and stability of this country in the name of freedom of expression. If a publisher violates the law he will deal with him/her according to law. According to him being a journalist does not give one a license to write anything one likes.
He indicated that no one is stopping public officers from talking to the media. The executive has not issued any directive preventing public officers from talking to the media.
He or his executive has not killed any journalist and the fact that many convicts are in the death row; he has never killed anyone sentenced to death shows that he would not kill anyone unlawfully, especially since he has sworn to uphold the constitution and the law. He emphasized that his government has no hand in the killing of Deyda Hydara or the disappearance of Chief Manneh.

Mr Swaebou Conateh, expressed the hope that the Executive would not use the occasion as a public relation exercise and welcome the invitation for a dialogue to address mutual concerns that would lead to the protection of freedom of expression and media. He called on the executive to do the following:
1. Decriminalise free speech
2. Revoke the law on sedition
3. Decriminalise libel and revoke the law on false publication
4. Enact Freedom of Information law
5. Ensure Regular press briefings at state house and occasional press conferences
He observed that a mere declaration by the president that public servants are free to talk to the press does not suffice. To make them free there should be a formal circular to that effect.

Mr. Pap Saine emphasized the need for the point newspaper to adhere to its mandate and added his voice to the following:
1. Access to information
2. Revocation of anti-media laws (libel, sedition and the newspaper amendment act)
3. Provision of more training opportunities
4. Revocation of education levy as far as newspapers are concerned
5. Reduction of taxation on newspapers
6. Government renewing its subscriptions to newspapers and making timely payment

SAM SARR
Sam Sarr of the Foroyaa cited section 207(3) of the constitution: “The press and other information media shall at all times, be free to uphold …… the responsibility and accountability of the Government to the people of The Gambia.” He told them that Foroyaa uses this as its guiding principle and asked them to explain the executive’s position on this constitutional mandate.
He also referred to section 208 of the constitution on the state owned media affording fair opportunities and facilities to express divergent views and dissenting opinions. He asked them to express an opinion on this. He told them that without pluralism holding the government accountable to the people will be meaningless.
He further told them that to hold the government accountable there must be access to information which is currently a problem. He cited a host of examples. There must also be freedom of expression, noting that thinking about the threat of going to jail when editing tantamount to self censorship which is inimical to freedom of expression.
He told them that there is no need for the government to become uneasy when the death of Deyda and the disappearance of Chief Manneh are mentioned as it should be the concern of both the media fraternity and the state.
HAMID
Mr. Hamid Adiamoh emphasised that though he carries a Nigerian passport, he considers himself a Gambian, noting that The Gambia enjoys peace and stability which many countries do not enjoy. He assured the president that all those media personnel that he knows in The Gambia media do not bear any ill-will against the President. That there are some who accused the government of being hostile to press freedom and that practice should be improved to allay such machinations.



Source:Foroyaa.gm

18 March 2011

Gambia News: Gambian Journalists Make Demands

A rare dialogue between the government and the independent media that seeks to smooth out the bitter relations between the two witnessed renewed calls by journalists for government to make legal and policy reforms inorder to allow an unimpeded access and free flow of information. 
Held on Wednesday at Statehouse, the meeting was described by both the media and government officials as a significant move towards settling the differences. 
“I would not wish to rekindle the fire of the old wounds,” said Mr Swaebou Conateh, the editor/publisher of The Gambia News & Report weekly magazine, referring to the detentions, prosecutions, attacks and the mysterious killing of Deyda Hydara, founder of The Point newspaper and disappearance of journalist Ebrima Manneh of Daily Observer.  
Conateh added: “However, it is not too late to adjust or re-adjust the position, so that the Gambia can, among its many achievements under the Jammeh administration, boast of having the most free press in Africa, if not in the whole world. 
Being the oldest practicing journalist in the country, Swaebou said: “I therefore propose to take the bull by the horns to ask for certain programmes of the government to be carried out in order to make more satisfactory and systematic progress on what is now a vexed question.”
Conateh calls for the decriminalizing of speech since one is in contravention with the universal principles as the free flow of information is necessary for human understanding cooperation and developments.
Our laws on sedition publication our libel laws and false publication laws are either archaic or out of step with the information age and should be repealed or revealed” saying that other countries have done this. 
Swaebou also called on the government to have an open door policy, recommending for the president, interior and foreign ministries to hold regular press briefing to entertain questions from media on offices they hold to clarify it to the public. 
“I know you are capable of doing it,” Conateh told the president, “But there is some reluctance on your part which makes us to have doubts about your intentions.” 
Mr Pap Saine, Managing Director and co-publisher of The Point newspaper emphasized the need for the independent press to access to government news in order to effectively execute its constitutional mandate to disseminate information about the activities of the government for the benefit of the public. 
“We want to make our position very clear that we are not an enemy to the state,” said Mr Saine, whose friend Deyda Hydara was gunned-down by unknown assailants since 2004. “The journalist does not see himself or herself in that role. We are neither backers of nor the opposition. Our job requires us to report on both the pleasant and the sordid aspects of society.” 
According to Sam Sarr, Editor of Foroyaa newspaper, governments have to be kept on their toes in order to assist them to become more effective, and also to preempt wrong doings and errors that may be created in the process of governance.
Mr Sarr highlighted that rather than government cooperating to bring about justice to the case of Deyda and others, there is uneasiness on the part of the executive whenever such cases are mentioned. 
According to him, the government is taking pride in allowing the large number of radio stations, but the fundamental question that should be asked is where they are allowed to broadcast local news. 
“There must be an alternative broadcast,” said Sam Sarr, who was among the six journalists jailed last year after found guilty sedition and defamation, but release after two months following presidential pardon. 
“There must be divergent views and dissenting opinion,” he added.   
For Abdul Adiamoh, publisher of Today Newspaper, The Gambia is a very beautiful country, but the Gambian media is denied to portray the image of the country. 
Adiamoh said he is a Nigerian, but he considers himself as a Gambian. He told the president that throughout his extended stay in the country, he has not seen a single Gambian journalist locally who is set out to vilify the country.


Source:dailynews.com