22 March 2011

Senegal News: Tunisia, Egypt... Who's next? Senegal?

By Bram Posthumus
The world's eyes were on the Arab revolutions only a few short weeks ago. In Tunisia and Egypt, long-standing autocratic regimes were toppled. Could something similar happen in sub-Saharan Africa? 
The similarities appear striking: like North Africa, many countries south of the Sahara Desert have dead weight governments, in power for far too long and populations that suffer poverty and deprivation. What they also have in common is that religion permeates private and public life.
‘Inch Allah’
Take Senegal. No – better: take any taxi in Senegal, or walk into a working space. Nine times out of ten, you will find a portrait hanging on the wall, or suspended from the rear view mirror. And on the streets you will see people walk around with a collier around their necks, carefully attached to a portrait. One of the most revered men thus portrayed is late Cheikh Amadou Bamba, the founding father of a prominent Muslim brotherhood here, the Mourides.
Religion (in this case: Islam) and society are intimately interwoven in ways that in Europe no longer exist. One more example: absolutely every prediction about the future, even the simplest ‘see you tomorrow’ is punctuated with a heartfelt ‘Inch’Allah’ (God Willing). No-one in Europe would dream of invoking God when organising their Blackberries.
The real experts
How does religion interact with politics, the economy and the day-to-day running of a village, a city – or indeed a nation? That is the subject of an elaborate research project, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It includes (among others) Indonesia, Egypt, Nigeria and Senegal. Gerben de Jong the Dutch Ambasador to Senegal, explains the reasoning behind the project. “We work here, we talk with the authorities here and of course also with many citizens. So we have some knowledge of Islam in Senegal but it was considered good to gain more profound insights. For this, we could not think of anyone better to ask than the real experts, the researchers. In the end, the aim is better knowledge of and better relationships with countries like Senegal.’
The project makes even more eminent sense at a time when Europe – and the Netherlands in particular – serve as backdrop for raging debates about the place of Islam in a largely secularised continent. But this was, the Dutch Embassy in Dakar hastened to add, not the subject of the research project.
Brotherhoods unite
For Senegalese religious expert and scholar Dr Cheikh Geye that interplay between religion and politics is particularly interesting. His point of departure is a word that keeps returning: cohesion.
“Look,” he says, “We have 95% of the population adhering to one of the Muslim brotherhoods. That creates order, hierarchy and real social cohesion. And don’t forget: all brotherhoods have become powerful political, social and economic actors. They are anchored in the past because of how they were founded but they are highly modern and dynamic.’
Bills and popularity
That word, “cohesion”, has long been a defining feature of Senegal. But there are signs of strain. Eleven years of liberal policies under president Abdoulaye Wade have left most Senegalese worse off. Corruption is perceived to be more alive and in-your-face than ever before and then there are the endless, highly disruptive power cuts. This is bringing people out on the streets in ever growing numbers. On March 19th the movement ‘Y en a marre!’ (We’re fed up!) came to the streets in thousands when president Wade celebrated the day he came to power. The regime appears clearly rattled. ‘We’re not Tunisia or Egypt,’ is the presidential mantra.
This may be true. But the Senegalese leader surely is acutely aware of the fact that the founder of the Mouride brotherhood he claims allegiance to is none other than...Cheikh Amadou Bamba. Bamba’s place is history is assured, if not for his piety then surely for his contribution to the anti-colonial struggle. The question today is whether the country and its people are really so fed up that they will welcome a similar religious leader. Well, here’s a pointer: an imam in the densely populated and poor area of Guediawaye, in Dakar, told his followers recently that if they had no electricity – they should just stop paying their bills... 
Source:http://www.rnw.nl

Senegal Seeks Donor Funding for Regional Road-Building Plan


Bloomberg-Senegal is requesting donor support for a 1.6 trillion-CFA-franc ($3.5 billion), five-year plan to improve the West African nation’s road network, said Karim Wade, minister for infrastructure, international cooperation, air transport and energy.
The plan includes highways bound for Mauritania, Mali and Burkina Faso along with bridges crossing the Gambia and Casamance rivers, Wade told reporters in Dakar today.
“Our objective is to transform Senegal into a competitive industrial and commercial hub in sub-Saharan Africa with perfect connectivity,” Wade said.
Senegal should spend as much as 4.5 percent of its gross domestic product on road construction, compared with the current 2 percent, said Moctar Thiam, transport sector leader with the World Bank.

GAMBIA NEWS: PDOIS´ STATEMENT THE MEETING BETWEEN THE PRESS AND THE EXECUTIVE

Issued by Halifa Sallah
We have watched and listened very carefully to the statements made by heads of media houses in the Gambia and that delivered by President Jammeh. PDOIS deems it necessary to state our policy on the Media just to convince the Gambian people how a government that is genuinely committed to the protection to freedom of expression and freedom of the Media would have handled the first major encounter between the Gambian Media and the Executive.
We have reflected on every word uttered by heads of media houses and those uttered by the members of the executive. We have weighed their words against the scales of reason and decency. We want the Gambian people in particular and those who have heard the programme to reflect on the words of the two sides and judge for themselves which side has displayed greater maturity and decency.

We in PDOIS would like to affirm that contrary to what President Jammeh had said that it is not his aim to appease the media fraternity, democratic governance is inconceivable without appeasing the sovereign people.
The Constitution is very clear on this and we will never get tired of repeating its very words that “The Sovereignty of the Gambia resides in the people of the Gambia from whom all organs of Government derive their authority and in whose name and for whose welfare and prosperity the powers of government are to be exercised….”
Democracy is government by consent. Consent comes through appeasement. A government has a role to lead by consent or rule by coercion. There is no middle road. Those who lead by consent are called democrats and those who rule by coercion are called tyrants. Each government has to choose one system or the other.
PDOIS is committed to lead by consent. It is left to the APRC to decide how it intends to govern.
This is why we value the opinions expressed by heads of the Media houses. If we were in the shoes of the President we would have asked the Attorney General to take note when the heads spoke about the need to repeal unfriendly media laws and the recommendation to enact a Freedom of Information Act. We would have asked the Minister of Finance to take note of the complaints lodged against levies and taxes that make it difficult for the Media houses to operate. The Minister of information would have been asked to take note of the restrictions placed on the State media and Non Governmental Radio stations in broadcasting divergent views and dissenting opinions. The Minister of the Interior would have been asked to take note of the concerns raised regarding diligent investigation into the cases of Journalists like Deyda Hydara and Chief Manneh. The Head of the Civil Service would have been asked to take note of the concerns about access to information from public servants.
We would have raised the issue of a self regulatory mechanism to ensure that the media publishes or broadcasts the truth in good faith in the public interest, retract wrong reports and render apologies. We would have signed a memorandum of understanding with the Media operatives and consult them in the appointment of any Minister of Information.
Did the President and his Vice President and Ministers take this approach? The answer is in the negative.
They made allegations that journalists are untrained when most reporters have undergone and are undergoing training to develop their professionalism. They claim that journalists do not publish the good things the government does even though the pages of newspapers are filled with reports of workshops, seminars, projects launched or press releases issued by government institutions. They gave the impression that in the West one could only be a journalist if one has a diploma or degree in journalism when some renowned journalists and broadcasters had never been in the four cornered walls of a school of journalism and had developed their professionalism through apprenticeship. They gave the impression that in the West newspapers do not give support to political parties when one could even classify newspapers ideologically in those countries.
In our view, in any democratic society, there is the state media which is maintained by the tax payers and the non-state media which is maintained through its readers and clients for advertisement. In such a country a party must be divorced from the state and the state media must publish or broadcast divergent views and dissenting opinion.
It goes without saying that since the media is a mere instrument for the amplification of the voices of the people, one could have media belonging to religious, political, cultural and social groups.
What is very clear is that the non state Media establishments which operate commercially in democratic societies could be classified into three types. Some do give editorial leanings to conservative parties and others to progressive parties. Others take the middle road and take no sides. However, regardless of the leaning of a media establishment it is ethically bound to publish the truth in good faith in the public interest. Truth, Good faith and the Public interest constitute the motto of the free press in a democratic society.
The Media Commission Act which was repealed was the most draconian media legislation that could be conceived by the human mind. Let us just highlight one provision to help refresh the mind of the nation to the content which made the whole world to condemn it. Section 13 required media practitioners to register with the Commission but excluded media practitioners employed by the state. Paragraph (5) of this section states that “the commission shall issue a licence to a media practitioner or media organisation registered under this section.”
It added that “the registration of a media practitioner or media organisation shall be valid for one year and may be renewed from year to year.”
In short, all media houses and practitioners would have had to renew their licence to operate annually. One could understand why the Media commission was rejected by media houses because of its contravention of section 25 of the constitution which provides the right to freedom of expression and freedom of the Media.
PDOIS will encourage the Media practitioners to come up with a self regulatory body which would rely on persuasive influence and peer pressure to ensure adherence to the principle of publishing the truth in good faith in the public interest by all.
PDOIS understands the importance of freedom of expression and freedom of the media. Without freedom of expression there can be no information and without information there can be no knowledge and without knowledge there can be no awareness and without awareness human beings will grope in the dark from the cradle to the grave. Such human beings could never enjoy liberty, dignity or prosperity.
We hope the executive will understand why all just human beings have kept the memory of Deyda Hydara alive. This is the only way to deter others from committing such heinous crime. Look at Mexico today and reflect on what organised crime has given birth to. When Deyda was murdered and Ousman Sillah shot it became clear that Gambia was graduating from being a small society where people, irrespective of their differences attend each other’s ceremonies and put aside their antagonisms to express condolences during funerals, and was beginning to nurture people with hearts of stones who could hide in the dark to kill and maim their fellow citizens with impunity. It was necessary for the conscience of the nation to be awakened by keeping alive the question: Who Killed Deyda Hydara?
We in PDOIS called on the executive to understand the motive and keep alive the call to rid the country of organised crime so that all will live in unity, freedom and peace each day. What all just Gambians have called for is diligent investigation into the killing of Deyda and the disappearance of Chief Manneh. This is not too much to ask for. All have heeded the call of the executive for information. All should forward the information available to them.
This is the aspiration of PDOIS. This is what we promise to work for if we ever take over the helm or take part in a coalition government that aims to truly lead by consent, reason and justice instead of ruling by coercion and might.
Be ready to judge us by our words and actions and not by our intentions.

Africa News: Togo: Violating the right to information

By Bernard Bokodjin 


In a country where the opposition isn’t strong and structured enough to provide a counterweight to a repressive regime which flouts the principles of democracy and good governance, the media provides a rare space for some amount of freedom of expression. But now, the media have also become part of the Togolese regime’s blacklist.

The former president of the Togolese republic General Gnassingbé Eyadéma died on 5 February 2005. He ruled the country with an iron fist for almost four decades – assassination, imprisonment and the routine violation of the human rights of political opponents were the order of the day. The Togolese people thought they were free after his death, but those hopes were scuppered by the army, which installed Eyadéma’s son in power. The repression which followed the people’s uprising led to a sham election to legitimise what was in fact a coup d’état by Gnassingbe’s son. 

Fauré Gnassingbé has managed to stay on in power in this tiny West African nation despite the will of his people and a blood bath, which according to the UN left 800 people dead. The track record of the ruling Rassemblement du Peuple Togolais is grim – there is systematic repression of protest, journalists are harassed and radios and newspapers have been shut down. 

Re-elected for a second term on 4 March 2010, President Fauré continues to use the same methods that allowed him to stay in power in 2005. While the people reel under miserable conditions – no sanitary infrastructure, bad roads, lack of drinking water – the regime chooses to go after whatever media dares to criticise its poor track record. Three radios (Radio Metropolys, X-Solair, Providence FM) have recently been banned and two newspapers (Golfe Info and the bimonthly Beninois Tribune d’Afrique) taken to court.

THE COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE PRESS

For some time now, the media have begun airing interactive programmes in a bid to help people understand political developments and current affairs. These programmes, often in local languages, allow people to express their opinions on issues or question guests on the show. The programmes have solid audiences, an important factor to remember in the context of the huge illiteracy rate (80 per cent) in Togo. However, the regime fears that these kinds of programmes could spark unrest and hence uses everything in its power to prevent the media from carrying on.

Radio X Solair was shut down on the pretext that it didn’t have an installation licence, though it had been on air for several years and had never defaulted on its annual tax. Two other radios were shut down immediately afterwards to cover up the campaign against X Solair. Radio Metropolys and Providence were also accused of not possessing a licence and that their infrastructure was rundown. It appears therefore that the regime doesn’t want these media outlets to function, given that it’s the High Authority for Broadcasting and Communication (HAAC) which issues licences in the first place.

The two newspapers in question were charged with defamation against Mey Gnassingbé, the brother of the head of state. On 25 August 2010, the Benin bimonthly was ordered to pay a 6 million FCFA fine and 60 million in damages to Mey Gnassingbé for having accused of him of links to drug trafficking. It was also banned in Togo. The appeal proceedings of the magazine Tribune d’Afrique, due to have taken place on 18 February, has been postponed to 14 April on the request of the plaintiff without any explanation. Naturally, the paper will be banned in Togo in the interim. 

Golfe Info, which has appealed against similar accusations, also has to wait until 14 April to know its fate, but at least it is allowed to publish in the meantime. The private Togolese newspaper was ordered by the First Appeals Court in Lome to pay a 1.5 million FCFA fine (US$3,000) for ‘misquoting’ the National Intelligence Agency (ANR) in one of its editions last September. The paper is facing a 100 million FCFA fine and a three-month suspension, as well as a public retraction of the alleged quote. Golfe Info, which is published three times a week, had published an article on 30 September on the arrest of a Togolese television anchor close to the presidency in a drugs-related affair. According to several sources, Eugene Attigan had been arrested at Lome International Airport.

The article in question, ‘Drug trafficking in Togo – an embarrassment for the presidency’, quoted the National Intelligence Agency as saying the television anchor had a diplomatic passport when he was arrested. The newspaper suggested he possessed a diplomatic passport because of his ties to the presidency.

The Togolese regime, which has been in power since 1967, remains deaf to calls for freedom of expression and information. Social justice movements therefore must continue to mobilise, especially after the recent World Social Forum in Dakar and challenge the arbitrary decisions of African rulers. Especially in Togo where municipal elections are around the corner, there is an urgent need for the polls to be democratic and transparent. Mobilisation is underway to push the authorities to allow the radios to go back on air and abandon legal proceedings against the newspapers.

Source: PAMBAZUKA NEWS 

21 March 2011

In Gambia, Jammeh asked to clarify Manneh's 'death'


After much denial about the whereabouts of Chief Ebrima Manneh, President Yahya Jammeh now says he is dead. The CPJ wrote to him to clarify.Below we produce the letter from the CPJ.

March 21, 2011
H.E. Yahya A.J.J. Jammeh
President of the Republic of The Gambia
State House
Banjul, The Gambia
Via facsimile +220 4227 034
Dear President Jammeh:
We request clarification of your March 16 comments suggesting "Chief" Ebrima Manneh, a reporter for the Daily Observer, may have died. Manneh disappeared after witnesses saw him being arrested by state security agents in the offices of the Daily Observer on July 7, 2007. The government has previously denied any knowledge of Manneh's fate.
"Let me make it very clear that the government has nothing to do with the death of Chief Manneh or Deyda Hydara or the disappearances of so many people," you said in a meeting with representatives of Gambian media that was broadcast on state television. You also suggested Manneh might have disappeared after attempting to illegally migrate to Europe or the United States.
Your statement implies knowledge of Manneh's fate that has not been conveyed to the journalist's family or disclosed publicly. In all previous public comments, administration officials have consistently denied any knowledge of Manneh's detention, whereabouts, or legal status. Those comments were made despite sightings of Manneh in government custody after his 2007 arrest. Government denials were also issued in response to a June 2008 ruling by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, which found sufficient evidence to conclude Gambian authorities had improperly detained Manneh.
In the interest of transparency and to relieve the anguish of Manneh's family, which deserves to know his fate, we call on you to fully disclose your knowledge of Manneh's fate and to order all appropriate investigations into his case.
We look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Joel Simon
Executive Director

Souce:cpj.org